News

Which Removable-Top Rarity Would You Rather Have? 1989 Nissan Pulsar vs 1990 Daihatsu Rocky

gameIcon
Sbsd 9 18 2026

We’ve gained a lot in recent years when it comes to cars, especially in terms of safety, but we’ve lost some cool stuff too. You don’t see many removable body parts anymore. Sure, you can still take the top and doors off your Jeep or Bronco, but nobody ever does. The two cars we’re going to look at today have removable rear roof sections that are probably light enough to actually take off with the help of a buddy.

I guess the majority of you share my affinity for old Mazda trucks, because it won yesterday. I’m a little surprised; I expected the 4Runner to put up a better fight. It sounds like the body damage didn’t do it any favors. If it were in better shape, it might have fared better, but then it wouldn’t have been $3,500.

Vidframe Min Bottom

I dig those old 4Runners, but I think I’d take the Mazda too. I had an earlier B2000 Sundowner when I lived in Minnesota, and I loved it. I have no need for another pickup, but a truck like that could be for fun, not just utility.

Screenshot From 2026 09 17 19 27 07

One of the things I like about the forthcoming Slate truck, and there’s a lot to like, is the reconfigurable body. It can be a pickup, two different styles of SUV, and probably other things too, once the aftermarket gets hold of it. But it’s definitely not a new idea. Both of the cars we’re going to look at today have removable rear roof sections, and one of them could be replaced with a whole new setup if you so desired. Let’s check them out.

1989 Nissan Pulsar NX – $3,495

811472625 1714929383975543 4603028050600379497 N
Image: Facebook Marketplace seller

Engine/drivetrain: 1.6-liter OHC inline-4, five-speed manual, FWD

Location: Sherwood, OR

Odometer reading: 146,000 miles

Operational status: Runs and drives well

Every time I see a Nissan from the 1980s or ’90s, it makes me wonder what the hell they’ve been doing for the past fifteen years. I mean, look at this thing: dramatic styling, T-tops, and two different owner-changeable rear body sections, and this was an economy car. Not the cheapest one Nissan offered, but not a whole lot more expensive. There’s no reason it can’t build stuff like this anymore, except fear that it won’t make as much money as the powers-that-be want. A modern Pulsar NX could be a really cool car, and it’s totally doable. But I suppose we’ll just have to be content with an old one.

793457732 1714921757309639 8791861474636137673 N
Image: Facebook Marketplace seller

There’s nothing special about the Pulsar mechanically; it’s the same thing as a Sentra from the era. It has a 1.6-liter four-cylinder with throttle body fuel injection that makes 90 horsepower, pretty typical for the time. It’s front-wheel-drive and has a five-speed manual. It runs and drives great, and the seller says they’ve never had any problems with it.

812729252 1714921833976298 6270370760465366387 N
Image: Facebook Marketplace seller

The interior is pretty well-preserved, but the seat fabric has a few popped threads that are concerning. You’ll have to be a little gentle with it, I think, to keep those seats nice. It doesn’t look water-damaged, though, which bodes well for the condition of the T-top seals.

813582674 1714921860642962 1944998443704769145 N
Image: Facebook Marketplace seller

I’ve always really liked the styling of the Pulsar. It’s a cool little car, with a lot of interesting details. This one is a little faded, but it’s straight and rust-free. It only comes with the standard hatchback, but that’s not a surprise; I haven’t seen one with the “Sportbak” station wagon back in years. I think it was more popular in the brochure than it was in real life.

1990 Daihatsu Rocky SX – $4,200

801284636 1584068996541131 5767606903997591827 N
Image: Facebook Marketplace seller

Engine/drivetrain: 1.6-liter OHC inline-4, five-speed manual, 4WD

Location: Warner Robins, GA

Odometer reading: 148,000 miles

Operational status: Runs and drives well

Japanese automaker Daihatsu has made some really cool vehicles over the years, but they aren’t well-known in the US. Daihatsu only officially sold cars in the US for five years, from 1988 to 1992. Only two models were offered: a tiny hatchback called the Charade, and this little 4×4, called the Rocky. These things are unbelievably rare. I haven’t seen a Rocky for sale for a very long time, and the last one I saw wasn’t nearly as clean as this.

797847220 1584058203208877 5113868985910899834 N
Image: Facebook Marketplace seller

Like its rival the Suzuki Sidekick, the Rocky is a body-on-frame design with a live rear axle and independent front suspension. It has four-wheel-drive through a dual-range transfer case. The engine is a 1.6 liter four-cylinder. This one runs and drives well, and it has a new clutch, but it does have a leaking power steering pump. You might just have to keep adding fluid to it for a while; I think a new pump might be hard to come by. Oh, and yes, that’s an aftermarket air filter, but the stock air box is included if you’d rather put it back to original.

797811708 1584058209875543 7607393061451846886 N
Image: Facebook Marketplace seller

The Rocky’s seats have fabric faces, but vinyl backs and sides. And it appears that vinyl isn’t Daihatsu’s strong suit. Both seats have cracks and rips in the vinyl portion. It’s worse on the driver’s side, as you’d expect. It’s in good condition otherwise, and the seller says the air conditioning works.

796980698 1584058406542190 4844676567613372476 N
Image: Facebook Marketplace seller

This Rocky was used as a tow-behind dinghy for an RV for many years, so it’s equipped with a tow bar on the front. And someone installed those awful-looking LED headlights in it. But it has cool two-tone paint in good condition, and five nice alloy wheels. More importantly, it isn’t rusted out.

You don’t see many of either of these on the road anymore, and you didn’t see many Rockies to begin with. Either one would give you plenty of cred at an ’80s/90s show like RADwood, and both should be fun to drive. Which one is more your style?